Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axesynth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Axesynth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Axesynth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG failure. Source to junk sites like deviantart, YouTube and various self published websites and I'm not finding significant coverage in reliable sources. Graywalls (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 02:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. It's not clear whether the instrument ever went into commercial production (neither electrokraft.com nor axetronic.com are extant) but it doesn't look like this one would have gained much interest from the Sharks. It's a shame: I'd love to own one. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, although I would like to own one as well... Caro7200 (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable. Less Unless (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.