Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axis of medieval

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Axis of medieval (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article constitutes original research by synthesis. It takes a relatively obscure phrase, used three times by Nicholas Kristof and once by Alex Kirby, and builds a framework that is not clearly supported by the underlying sources. As such, the article violates WP:NPOV and fails verifiability. It should be deleted because it doesn't meet these encyclopedic standards. *** Crotalus *** 01:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: As neologism. All of 176 Ghits, the lead one this article, and the overwhelming majority blog entries. Great, it's a nice pun, har de har har, but there's no evidence that this is more than a catchphrase in the mouths of a few bloggers.  Ravenswing  03:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence that this is actually in widespread use. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This has been at AfD before; Twinkle seems to have overwritten the old version. Perhaps someone more confident in such matters could fix? Regardless, delete per nom, as this seems to be a synthesis of primary sources which happen to use the term somewhere, not secondary sources which discuss the term itself (WP:NEO). Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 21:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not worthy of the 'pedia! --Camaeron (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - neologism U$er (talk) 21:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.