- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. Srikeit 10:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Transwikied, doesn't seem to deserve a Wikipedia article. Derlay 01:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A5: article already transwikied. —EdGl 01:03, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A5 transwikied not needed. Hello32020 01:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but not speedy. A5 only applies when the outcome of an AfD was to transwiki. -Amarkov blahedits 01:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Not speedy delete, per Amarkov. Sr13 01:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Delete per all above. –- kungming·2 (Talk) 02:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 03:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but a quick note to the nominator that {{prod}} can be used for generally uncontroversial deletions. theProject 04:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy gonzales - Ariba ariba ariba! Delete this obvious speedy... Spawn Man 08:17, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps a small mention and merge into synapse? Otherwise speedy delete, already transwikied and clearly not a candidate article title.- Mgm|(talk) 09:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, A5. --Terence Ong (C | R) 10:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.