- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Baker & Daniels. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- B&D Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of how this company is notable or how it might meet WP:CORP. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Google news is showing some press releases and hits on quotes from employees in various articles but nothing about the company itself. RadioFan (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to parent company article, Baker & Daniels. There are a lot of non-press release hits on Google News for this consulting subsidiary, actually, but only a few in-depth results. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 19:39, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Baker & Daniels. Information in the article can easily fit into the parent. LK (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.