Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. Shree Sundarkumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B. Shree Sundarkumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Makes some pretty bold claims of importance, but I'm not really finding anything online to back them up. Parts are close paraphrase of his myspace, but considering it is almost certainly an auto-bio I wouldn't consider it to be a copy vio. ThaddeusB (talk) 05:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 16:18, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A great many extravagant and POV claims in the article, but no true third party claims to notability by our standards. Article was speedied 3 times as nonnotable autobio. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 03:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • For sake of accuracy, it was actually speedied as a copyvio once each under Shree sundarkumar, Shreesundarkumar, and User:Shreesundarkumar. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this musician. Joe Chill (talk) 08:00, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt all the various versions as repeatedly recreated spam. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • All versions were contributed by the same person. It would be far more appropriate to just block that person if they continue than to salt 4 different titles (one of which is their userpage). --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:13, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No independant sources at all, which undermines any claims of notability. Edward321 (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.