Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B2N

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

B2N

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

B2N (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article lacks of good refs and fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. No significant coverage. Lorik17 (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Tagged for multiple issues, no sources cited for a BLP, there's no article about him on the Albanian WP, couldn't find anything that establishes notability, and the article was created by a COI editor (more precisely, the subject himself since "B2N Beats" wrote the article). None of these are good things, but the worst thing of them all is the fact that this managed to stay here since 2016. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not even close to meeting our inclusion criteria for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - vanity article about someone clearly nowhere near passing GNG or NMUSICIAN; deletion is long overdue here Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.