- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity and void of encyclopedic value Mecanismo | Talk 21:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN. Google finds references only on a couple of graffiti-related sites (and one of them is down). Unverifiable. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 22:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Mo0[talk] 04:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm from Chicago, never heard of them. Short, unverifiable. Madman 05:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete..."Bomb and Destroy" this article. nn. --MisterHand 15:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.