- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted by Thingg, as copyvio. (non-admin closure) - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- BLAST programme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article may be on a subject that is not notable enough for inclusion in wikipedia. The article appears to be written by someone associated with the project (see the use of the term 'we'), and appears to present an entirely positive view of the subject without criticism. The article is therefore tainted by conflict of interest and should be removed. Richard Cavell (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I've had a go at removing some of the unnecessary wording and I've tagged as I feel appropriate.Paste (talk) 20:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as can't see any notability despite the later edit efforts. --Oscarthecat (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've added citations and more supporting info on the page and it's talk page. The term 'we' was taken from a copy of the website text which I failed to edit. Enigmafx (talk) 22:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What you just said doesn't really help your case. You can't copy and paste copyrighted website text. - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as a copy violation. So tagged... GtstrickyTalk or C 23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.