- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Only two opinions, but I agree that the coverage as currently referenced in the article does not suffice for notability. Can be userfied for improvement on demand. Sandstein 08:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- BLATT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notability not established, no independent coverage Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 15:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 15:21, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agreed, independent coverage is lacking, and I can't find anything to establish notability. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There are a series of related articles that will need to be looked at, BLATT Books and BLATT Fest.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 16:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.