Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BSTR-B

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 20:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BSTR-B

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All primary sources, Google search shows no reliable secondary sources. Derild 49 21 ☼ 20:21, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication of notability of the subject, someone is using wikipedia as a promotional tool for this organization. this particular article is about a school which (presumably according to other article) pays a fee to be a member of the for profit "beaconhouse school system". see also the other two articles regarding this organization which have been nominated for deletion as well. WookieInHeat (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and WookieInHeat. --Kudpung (talk) 05:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree with no indication of notability of the subject

--Umar1996 (talk) 12:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable. AtticusX (talk) 19:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Farjad0322^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 11:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.