- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- BSides (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a corporation which does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. All possible references found seem to be press releases or routine coverage of events they host. The article itself is more just a list of their non notable events and an advertisement for their organization. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. No apparent significant coverage in reliable sources. Non-notable by the standards of WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:GNG or WP:42.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing convincing for at least minimal notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 07:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. — Music1201 talk 22:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.