Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BT Consulting and Systems Integration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to BT Group. —Centrx→talk • 23:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of above page AND related page Syntegra This subsidiary is only notable for its historical association with Control Data Corporation and for being a wholly owned subsidiary of BT Group plc[1]. It's not even called BT Consulting and Systems Integration anymore, its now called BT Global Services (Check out the redirects here). Recommend Delete & Redirect/Merge - (not that there's much to merge - hardly anything). The Global Services division is already mentioned on the main BT Group plc page. The relationship between Syntegra and CDC and BT is already mentioned on the Control Data Corporation page, and also to some extent on the Syntegra page. I am also nominating Syntegra for deletion/merge/redirect for similar reasons as its basically an older name for the same subsidiary. There's no reason to create all these separate pages for the same subsidiary. Bwithh 22:17, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Did you know that 'delete and merge' is copyright violation? I think you mean 'merge and redirect'. --ais523 14:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • um... huh? I don't even say 'delete and merge' Bwithh 21:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • To me it looks like you wrote 'Delete & Redirect/Merge'; however, if you're aware of the situation there's no need to continue this minithread any further. --ais523 13:06, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Syntegra did not have the deletion template added. Now fixed. Yomangani^talk 09:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to BT Group. No assertion of notability for this subsidiary, much less one that would satisfy any of the three criteria listed in WP:CORP. As such, there is no coverage by credible, third-party sources as required by WP:V to support a stand alone article. --Satori Son 02:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.