- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete - page was blanked by author; regardless, AfD consensus was inevitably going to be delete - Richardcavell 02:03, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know WP isn't paper, but... keystroke combinations in computer games?? NN in my opinion. NawlinWiki 02:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete That is some amazing gamecruft right there. But that is a strategy I use frequently. -- Kicking222 02:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Kids, get your cheat codes somewhere else Adambiswanger1 04:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, such as instruction manuals. This fits perfectly into policy as not being for wikipedia. Kevin_b_er 04:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, not even worth merging.--Andeh 04:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia isn't another cheat code website. fuzzy510 06:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. I would expect to read this sort of information on a games cheats website. (aeropagitica) (talk) 08:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per amazing gamecruftiness. Wiki is not an indiscriminate collection of information, a game guide NN and totally unencyclopedic Ydam 11:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Page blanked by author. Eluchil404 20:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per Eluchil404 --Starionwolf 20:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.