- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 10:26, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that this article seems to be a rather large advertisement, and also an insignificant article. Seeing as it was written by the members of this site, it is biased and it does seem that they are trying to attract members. I do not see any criticisms, just advertisements here. -84.66.132.133 (08:42, 16 October 2005 UTC)
- I agree. The article does seem more of an advertisement than anything. -Anonymous (14:29, 16 October 2005 68.238.199.245 UTC)
- I do not agree. The article explains the truth of a website that is constantly flamed and spammed on other forums that they're dictators. Besides, who made the article? Did the owners? No, they did not. Keep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.69.245 (talk • contribs) 19:33 16 October 2005 (UTC)
- In response, At least there should be some criticisms. Nothing is perfect. Also, I took a look around that site, and one of their Members originally made the article. -84.66.132.133 (19:01, 17 October 2005 UTC)
- Speedy keep, no new argument has been made that was not addressed in the original VFD. -DDerby-(talk) 05:42, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable forumcruft.--Isotope23 15:23, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per DDerby, and clean up the article. --Mairi 22:04, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is popular allready. It shouldn't need an article to help it.--AgentA
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.