Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baboon Operating System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Personal observation, this diesn't look like a baboon to me. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baboon Operating System

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. An online search of this operating system reveals no third-party, reliable sources. It is simply not notable yet. Singularity42 (talk) 20:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree, article has no notability. --Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 20:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any independent coverage, or any sources at all for that matter. FuFoFuEd (talk) 03:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. --DeVerm (talk) 05:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - There is no evidence of notability. The article is unreferenced. Searching for "Baboon OS" OR "Baboon Operating System" on Google returns 48 "unique" web results. With the exception of what appear to be two self-published ODT documents, all results are irrelevant coincidental instances of "baboon" being next to "os", sometimes across sentences, and not the subject. The same query returns no News results, 13 Books results, and 9 Scholar results. The Books and Scholar results are once again irrelevant for the same reasons as most of the Web results. Rilak (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Rilak. Searching for baboon + mcdermott and for baboon + dessek (two main contributors named in article) also turns up nothing. $Sharktopus$ ^talk 03:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.