- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Babylon Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. SnottyWong spout 23:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND. Unsigned and not even an album yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no space for Myspace bands. Does not fulfil any of the criteria in WP:MUSIC Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails notability criteria for bands. The Battle of the Bands is not a major music competition. Armbrust Talk Contribs 10:44, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unremarkable band, does not meet the requirements for notability in a band. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Armbrust. Joaquin008 (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete - non notable band. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.