Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back and in Attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Pedro :  Chat  15:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back and in Attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Per WP:MUSIC, unreleased albums are not notable unless there has been substantial coverage in reliable sources. Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 01:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable album, wasn't released, hasn't been covered in any reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. • Anakin ^(talk) 15:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. A1octopus (talk) 20:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Thamusemeantfan (talk) 02:28, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.