Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back in Bu$ine$$
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was A9, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Back in Bu$ine$$ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks substantial RS coverage in gnews and gbooks, and Allmusic never heard of it. Zero refs. Epeefleche (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 January 26. Snotbot t • c » 23:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 11:14, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, no proof that album exists. WP:PUTEFFORT fail. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.