Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to the Bible

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 10:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Back to the Bible

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Back to the Bible (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per various source searches, this organization does not meet WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:10, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep; I think I have added sufficient citations from looking up the topic in Google Books. In any case I would have kept the page because of the radio program's past cultural significance. This is attested by a large number of incoming links, including casual mentions such as "Shortly after returning to regular programming with the nationally syndicated religious program Back To The Bible" in Timeline of JFK assassination. In case the article is somehow not kept, merge basic info to Christian_radio#Christian_radio_programs and redirect there. – Fayenatic London 21:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved with the addition of reliable book sources and passes WP:GNG, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.