- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 15:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Backup Dwarf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no article. Miami33139 (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - If Joe Chill can't find significant coverage, there isn't significant coverage. Non-notable. Nice name, though, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 15:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No references. December21st2012Freak (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I only see a few hits on Google, and I don't think any are really related to this software. Thus, I am unconvinced that this subject is the focus of a multitude of non-trivial coverage by reliable third-party sources. Cocytus [»talk«] 02:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.