- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. —Darkwind (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bad Astronaut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band that fails both WP:BAND and WP:GNG. I could not find any news coverage about this band at all, either at GNews or Bing News, and general Internet searches only turn up routine coverage and primary sources such as the band's website, myspace page, and various music services like last.fm. —Darkwind (talk) 23:19, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sufficient coverage exists: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. I don't imagine that's everything that exists. --Michig (talk) 06:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. I was under the impression that Allmusic is not a reliable source, but aparently the consensus at RSN says otherwise, so that does appear enough to pass GNG. Nomination withdrawn. —Darkwind (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.