- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete —Mets501 (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even sure this Halo insult that has "just recently started to get popular" even deserves consideration as a transwiki. Daniel Case 03:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete — The article practically admits it's a completely non-notable nelogism mboverload@ 04:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete. I don't even see how it's insulting. –NeoChaosX (talk | contribs) 04:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, neologism, possible attempt to astroturf a protologism. --Kinu t/c 04:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Leuko 04:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Can we speedy delete this under WP:SNOW? ColourBurst 04:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete — as nonsense - Glen 04:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC) - Glen 04:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, patent nonsense. At the very least a non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wryspy 04:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete — Speedy Delete as Patent nonsense, non-notable neologism. ShaunES 07:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (chat me up/fix me up) 08:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy the damn thing, what a load of nonsense. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • ER • 09:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.