Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad spelling and grammar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 12:45, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are only 13 Google hits for "bad spelling and grammar" tim bowen, most of them Myspace pages and the like. (The title is an accurate description of this article, by the way.) sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 02:59, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This AfD page blanked by 68.88.177.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). sɪzlæk [ +t, +c, +m ] 04:03, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. -Nameneko 05:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Bad article and grammar. I mean, Delete. --FOo 06:27, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per FOo. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 09:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and Foo. --JoanneB 15:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.