- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Either a neologism or hoax. No hits in google or Medline for "Baggle-Flumper" "Baggle Flumper" "Baggle Flump" etc. Prod removed by only editor. References promised by the editor have not appeared, and the article is now identical to the original edit. Mr Stephen 22:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- actually, now that it's listed for AfD, Google gives a hit [1] ikh (talk) 08:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
FlumpDelete, fails WP:HOAX and WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk 22:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Strong delete and almost certainly qualifies for speedy at that. Utter nonsense. ~ Matticus78 22:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:BALLS Danny Lilithborne 23:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. hoax/nonsense--Fuhghettaboutit 00:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - complete bollocks ikh (talk) 08:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.