- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No prejudice against a nomination that actually advances an argument for deletion. Courcelles 00:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bahram Soroush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ENT. not notable enough. Poor references. DrPhosphorus (talk) 18:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC) — DrPhosphorus (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Subject is not an entertainer, thus the nominator's rationale is irrelevant. Edward321 (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Apart from the subject not being an entertainer there is also no AfD notice in the article. This should be closed without prejudice to a future nomination with a valid deletion rationale and proper notification. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.