Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balanced approach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per WP:G12, "Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/pages/noise.aspx" North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Balanced approach

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article on a vaguely defined topic that does not appear to have attracted the attention of multiple, reliable, independent sources. KDS4444^Talk 15:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a copyright violation. Copied completely from the International Civil Aviation Organization website. The topic though would be a good addition to Aircraft noise. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.