- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Balcan-IX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted (at least twice) as a speedy. Recent speedy and prod contested. Listing here for greater audience. I don't think it passes WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 18:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no independent, in-depth coverage, just scraps of dubiously-sourced data. And as for the (unsubstantiated) claim that this is "the largest Internet Exchange in Romania": so? May as well have an article on the largest bicycle vendor in Peru, the largest pig farm in Denmark, or the largest swimming pool in Burma. At some point, these "largest X in Y" signifiers descend into the trivial, and that is the case here. - Biruitorul Talk 19:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unremarkable topic. Not finding sufficient reliable sources RadioFan (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.