Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball in cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect to Ball in a Cup. – Sceptr e ^(Talk) 16:09, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ball in cup

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non-notable game. Wikipedia is not for things made up in the pub one day. Has already been speedily deleted as nonsense and recreated. -- RHaworth 11:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per the nomination. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 11:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ball in a Cup. Why spend another day not catching a ball in a cup when you can be catching a ball in a cup? Weregerbil 11:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That episode was actually on tonight. The universe works in mysterious ways... --Kinu ^t/_c 02:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ball in a Cup. You beat me to it, Weregerbil. :-) -- Kjkolb 11:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Arnzy (Talk) 14:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ball in a Cup. CalJW 16:50, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a sport dammit and its not Ball in A Cup its ball in cup. We have a league...there are dozens of us.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.132.104 (talk • contribs)

keepPirkovank 20:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep and redirect Ball in a Cup here. This is the stronger article, and I think the anon above is correct as to the preferred name. ProhibitOnions 21:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- This has nothing to do with "the" ball in a cup game mentioned in the other article that's been around forever. Its length does not make it stronger in any form. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:28, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agreed, "stronger" is a relative term, as it's still jokey and full of misspellings and probable vanity. I'll research this some more; till then, my vote is withdrawn. ProhibitOnions 09:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Do not redirect to Ball in a Cup, as that should probably be deleted. too. (Try Googling these terms and you'll see what I mean.) dbtfz ^talk 21:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Reads like it's WP:NFT. The "Famous Players" was a good chuckle, though. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Ball in a Cup as this is WP:NFT. I give the writers credit for a very detailed article though! -- Mithent 02:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What can be changed or added that would allow the page to remain as a part of this encylopedia?

Keep Don't delete this on merit coming from google this is an actual game and is actually played...if beer pong is a page why isnt this. —This unsigned comment was added by JimmyRibaudo (talk • contribs) .

Only contributions by this user are to this AfD and its related article.

Delete -O bli (Talk)^? 22:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Every game has it's begining stages, what would have happened if games like baseball and football were shot down because people didn't take them seriously as a game someone invented in their backyard. The fact of the matter is all games have a begining and if ours isn't given a chance how will it ever get off the ground? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goatdonkey10 (talk • contribs)

Only contributions by this user are to this AfD and its related article.

Keep how is this not considered a game, after reading this, ive since tried playing it and not only is it quite a challenge, its a blast to play! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.196.115 (talk • contribs)

Only contributions by this user are to this AfD and its related article.

Delete, utter nonsense and unverifiable to boot. Stifle 23:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If Wikipedia is this game's only chance of getting off the ground, its pretty clear that it doesn't meet WP:NFT or notability requirements. --Hetar 08:58, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT.--Isotope23 16:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - i played a game very similar to this when growing up, it is a verifiable game and should not be deleted - Mike Goings —This unsigned comment was added by 68.188.78.114 (talk • contribs) .

Only contributions by this user are to this AfD.

Redirect to Ball in a Cup Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 03:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - i dont see why it should be redirect, ball in a cup and ball in cup are two completely different things and should not be connected. ball in cup should have its own page and is a very real game. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.107.196.115 (talk • contribs) .
Delete, vanity / non-notable. 156.34.90.110 00:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.