Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandi Sailu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bandi Sailu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bandi Sailu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, and searches turned up no WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:BIO. It's possible that non-English sources are available, and if these are identified, I would be happy to withdraw my nomination. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and India. SunloungerFrog (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – A completely unsourced article is an egregious WP:BIO violation. English search results online return nothing, but the person who removed the PROD 15 years ago should have carried the responsibility of finding non-English language sources or print sources. Reading the article, the topic is potentially notable, but how do we know this article's topic isn't a hoax if no sources can be found online and there are no sources cited in this article? Yue🌙 20:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:47, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 18:56, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete A7 Mccapra (talk) 19:43, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.