Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bang Bang Machine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bang Bang Machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable band and possibly written by someone close to the subject. GamerPro64 06:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. GamerPro64 06:49, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Sufficient citations to demonstrate meeting WP:MUSICBIO, added to the article since nomination. This includes a substantial broadcast segment on national radio, critical coverage in reliable sources, and #10 in the UK Independent Singles and Albums Charts. ResonantDistortion 09:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, having a song at #96 UK singles chart should be enough for notability Microplastic Consumer (talk) 04:53, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: per Microplastic Consumer.
Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
per WP:MUSICBIO. ROY is WAR Talk! 16:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.