Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangkok Bus Line 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bangkok Bus Line 1

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bangkok Bus Line 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just another non notable, run of the mill, bus route that doesn't need special treatment by having its own article. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete The topic clearly fails WP:GNG and the content has been cited with only two primary sources which seems to be unreliable. The bus routes do not hold any significance. Abishe (talk) 12:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Briefly mentioned in this Bangkok Post article about bad service, where it's ranked the second worst in Bangkok,[1] as well as lots of news items about their bad driving.[2][3][4][5] --Paul_012 (talk) 07:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (not speedy, which clearly does not apply); although there's no reason bus routes must be deleted, those that survive usually do so on account of a ~century of history being accumulated in reliable sources. However, we also have a policy preventing us from listing those that are non-notable. ——SN54129 17:23, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.