- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bantam Trek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be a non-notable local event lacking GHit and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:EVENT and fail to establish notability. ttonyb (talk) 00:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is an ongoing local (Bradford 6th largest city in the uk), officially backed by Bradford City FC a professional football league club in the 6th largest city. And also covered by The national and local media (the national being tv so as yet no citations from the bbc, but the local press is not just some small time village rag, it is the telegraph and argus. I could cite more but for fear of complaints of repetition). I can only assume that somebody who thinks that this is some small local event, is not from the uk. maybe somebody from the uk should get involved in deciding.Easybizsites (talk) 01:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Easybizsites (talk • contribs) 01:04, 2 May 2011 (UTC) — Easybizsites (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Note: this username was blocked on May 2, 2011 per WP:GROUPNAME.[reply]
Another citation edited, all from verified sources that are impartial and not linked to Bantams Trek. Anything else needed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Easybizsites (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
+++++KEEP+++++++ This should be removed from deletion. Organization raising money with on a non stop basis through a pro football club for a burns unit that does work world wide. Is not just a one off, and their sources are better than most on here. Preceding unsigned commented added by User:89.243.21.14 — 89.243.21.14 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete There does not seem to be any Reliable Source reporting on these charity walks, with the single exception of this from the Telegraph and Argus. All the other sources provided are self-referential. Nothing at all found at Google News Archive [1]. The fact that it raises money for a good cause is not reason enough to keep the article on Wikipedia; the event has to meet the requirements of notability, and it fails by a country mile. --MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.