Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Milner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Milner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a former television personality, "referenced" only to her archived former staff bio on the website of her own employer and not to any evidence of reliable source coverage about her. Having a staff bio on the website of the company you work for, however, is not a notability pass: a person has to be the subject of coverage in sources she doesn't work for to pass a Wikipedia inclusion criterion. Bearcat (talk) 15:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only 3rd party ref I can find is [1], a long article in the Toronto Star about her home decorating skills , completely irrelevant to notability DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, DGG, and that my searches turned up nothing further. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:52, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.