Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrett Rakestraw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article shows why an IMDB listing doesn't in itself prove notability. This guy has 10 screen roles, all "uncredited", and is "consulting producer" of one syndicated TV talk show. Nonnotable in my book. NawlinWiki 00:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, just because you don't know the person doesn't automatically make it "vanity"
• Delete per nom, fails WP:BIO criteria. Only 314 Google results [1]--TBCTaLk?!? 01:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO. --Bill (who is cool!) 01:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not free hosting for his resume. Alphachimp ^talk 01:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 01:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete An extra to me. Everything in imdb is 'uncredited', and imdb allows anyone to submit credits. So all information could be vanity. Kevin_b_er 06:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nn AdamBiswanger1 13:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing encyclopedic herePatcat88 04:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.