- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:41, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable hazing activity (or something like that) at one university. Certainly does not seem to be sufficiently notable. Prod removed. delete. Grandmasterka 08:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--blue520 09:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable hazing ritual. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Pretty funny stuff. DarthVader 11:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced and does not seem notable. PJM 11:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Believe it or not, "basining" is a real term of interest to numismatists. But the current article subject is a neologism / WP:NFT. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nom. --Xyrael T 17:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A funny article, but Delete —Mets501 (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Coredesat 01:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 02:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the uh, interesting article. It is non-notable. --Starionwolf 03:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the article. It is non-notable.--Cheezymadman 01:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Funny, but not notable.--Auger Martel 08:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.