Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baskaran krishnan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 12:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Baskaran krishnan

Baskaran krishnan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Promotional article probably written by subject. Takiing this straight to AfD since some people might consider that there is a claim to notability there TheLongTone (talk) 12:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:53, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Searched. Found nothing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unambiguous SPA advertising. Vague sourcing. Violation of WP:NPOV and WP:NOTYELLOW. A search for sources (disclaimer: in English only) found no significant coverage. Basically the entire article is written from the topic's point of view. The main bold claim for notability "In 1985 he invented the new system in Indian Astrology" is rather unlikely and would need a high-quality source for verification. GermanJoe (talk) 13:40, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.