Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassivity Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 23:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bassivity Digital

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The parent company is currently at AfD and is looking like it will be deleted. The notability issues are clear to see for this one as well. I've noticed that User:doomsdayer520 added maintenance templates a while ago which were removed with no attempt to address the issue. I can't see how this subsidiary of a non-notable record label would meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Spiderone 12:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (WP:A10) as a near-duplicate of Bassivity Music which is also currently nominated for deletion, with a robust discussion of the entire operation's lack of notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that it qualifies for A10, unfortunately, as it's not a recently created article. I do, however, have my concerns about Relja Milanković Reksona's notability as well. Article creator for all three articles seems to be an SPA. Spiderone 14:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Delete" and "Speedy Delete" are merely a procedural distinction. If I'm in favor of one then there should be no doubt that I'm in favor of the other as well. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 18:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spiderone, another related page, Oneya was up for deletion a while back Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Oneya. The outcome is delete. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, that one was actually created by a different user to these other 3 articles Spiderone 15:48, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the only sources I could find were either obviously non-independent, or user-generated content. Does not meet GNG, or NMUSIC#5. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.