- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. SushiGeek 02:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very little content, unencyclopedic material Modular. (Talk.) 23:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, horrid dicdef. StarryEyes 23:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above - not a word, so not a candidate for Wiktionary. KillerChihuahua?!? 00:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Wiktionary already has wikt:right back and wikt:BRB; I don't think there's a need to transwiki anything. — TKD::Talk 03:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Terence Ong 04:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. NTK 21:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WINAD. Stifle (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Usually I hate to delete articles about topics like these, but (no offense) this article is just stupid. Freddie 01:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Moe ε 18:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.