Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beacon Publishing Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beacon Publishing Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable publisher which fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, and WP:GNG. Next to no sources exist, and none that do are substantive by any measure. This article likely only exists because it was created by a now-blocked COI editor, though this in itself is not a reason for deletion. The other points, however, are. SamHolt6 (talk) 04:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete . Clearly lacks coverage to satisfy NCORP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 06:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP etc as stated by proposer. COI should really be made grounds for deletion in cases like this Lyndaship (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:ORG. scope_creep (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.