- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Beamdog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Listing per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 March 21. I abstain. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 21:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unable to find any detailed coverage of the main topic. Bongomatic 13:15, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: though I didn't find much, deletion seems to be impractical, as Beamdog will attract more attention with the new game releases. Though, my vote is for service, not for the company behind it. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added 3 references, all from the sources seemingly qualifying for WP:IRS criteria. In my opinion, the article now satisfies WP:NWEB. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - extended coverage in the interview, plus the other sources, allow for enough descriptive content to be written. Diego (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Seems to be correct, web returns results with google search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syscamel (talk • contribs) 04:47, 29 March 2012 (UTC) — Syscamel (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SW— babble 03:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 04:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.