Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beate Bille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:52, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beate Bille

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article seems to partially meet CSD G6 for a disambiguation page. However a speedy was declined. If you go to the page, you will only see that one of the two links work. Until there is a notable presences, I feel that this disambiguation page is not needed keystoneridin! (talk) 20:56, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles don't "partially meet" speedy deletion criteria, but either meet or don't meet them, and this one does not. And both of the links work, i.e. the links to Tycho Brahe, where there is coverage of the more famous Beate Bille, and to Beate Bille (actress). Phil Bridger (talk) 21:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this article because the two articles on the page should be separate. Tycho Brahe should have his own page only being born to a person named Beate Bille who does not have an active page.

Sorry, but I find that statement totally incomprehensible. Please could you try again in clearer English? Phil Bridger (talk) 22:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please define the English standard that you are looking for and I will try to be clearer.keystoneridin! (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The standard of comprehensible English. I can just about see some meaning in your first sentence, although that apparent meaning doesn't make sense as the two disambiguated articles already are separate, but the second sentence is total gobbledygook. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please define the standard. I searched for a "standard of comprehensible English", but found nothing. If you can define, in detail, what you want I will be glad to address your concern(s).keystoneridin! (talk) 23:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Delete, move Beate Bille (actress) to Beate Bille, and add a hatnote to Tycho Brahe. Two entries, especially when one is a redlink, don't require a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: dab page at base name for two people neither of whom is obviously the primary usage. All in order. PamD 18:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, move Beate Bille (actress) to Beate Bille and hatnote. Being Tycho Brahe's mom must have been a position to be proud of, but notability is not inherited, so the actress is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The Tycho article does not need a disambig from his mother's name, and the actress article is in no way going to pass AfD. If the page is kept at all, then simply redirect to the actress as the PrimaryTopic until the PROD or AfD (if needed) plays out. --Tgeairn (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Delete Beate Bille and move Beate Bille (actress) to Beate Bille's spot. There's no indication here that Beate Clausdatter Bille is notable and I'd rather not see an AfD for one article turn into an AfD for another subject for which an article doesn't even exist yet. If an article is created, move Beate Bille (actress) back to its current ___location and recreate the disambiguation page. No use is creating such a stir over a subject that doesn't even have an article let alone established notability. OlYeller21^Talktome 22:40, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.