- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy G11 - UtherSRG (talk) 13:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Beaux Jangles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete No evidence of substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Article is essentially spam, created by a single purpose account used only for plugging BABCO's products. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure promotion with no content apart from fluff. Fails WP:GNG. Johnuniq (talk) 11:27, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; I can find no evidence that the subject's received substantial coverage in reliable sources (nothing at all relevant, for example, in a Google News archive search). The cited source "Babco: Always About Quality" is something I'm unable to find any further details of. It has the ring of promotional material. Gonzonoir (talk) 13:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.