- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Renata 06:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
personal opinion + non-notable PeregrineAY 06:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if this was without personal opinion, I would suggest a WEAK merge with the article on beavers...but alas this simply doesn't have any value. -WarthogDemon 07:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete seems to fail WP:NOT#SOAPBOX, although I have no problem with an article on problems, issues and theories of the beaver population. If there is any valuable information in this article, it should be moved to Beaver and this fork deleted. -Markeer 16:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article culd have merit if it was about current control methods and policy, but it is currently simply a POV. Needs to completely start from scratch to be of any merit. Canderra 18:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.