Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeeBole (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- BeeBole (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no coverage for this company. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 00:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Though their product has a few positive user reviews on Google Apps, I am finding nothing in terms of reliable sources to indicate notability for this firm or their product. AllyD (talk) 05:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - references provided do not meet threshold of significant coverage - brief mention in two long lists of companies, and a user-editable developer's site. A search did not reveal significant RS coverage in English, though it is possible that there are foreign language sources. Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 10:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.