- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Begin Chess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This chess book does not seem notable enough to be worth its own article. It can be merged in List of chess books instead. SyG (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've already added it to List of chess books. Rcsprinter (chatter) 11:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non notable book. Most sources are Book Sellers, one or two reviews are from chess magazines don't assert it as notable. Also seems to be a bit of puffery going on. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The book is by a notable author, but I don't think this book is notable. Its Amazon sales rank is No. 6,000,000+, so I don't think it is a big seller. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:24, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence is present of the book meeting the criteria of the WP:BK guideline. Although the author is notable, notability is not inherited, especially not "downwards" (that is, from a "general" subject (an author) to more specific subjects (individual books)). Sjakkalle (Check!) 18:32, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, per wp standards.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:21, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.