Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Being with Dying

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being with Dying (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Nonnotable counseling program, no independent sources. NawlinWiki 20:14, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May make a decisive "vote" later, but my initial thoughts are: would a merge into Joan Halifax be appropriate? →EdGl 22:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No independant information about the article's subject; I see no availible reliable sources to build a verifiable article around. I am not convinced that Joan Halifax has enough reliable sources to build an encyclopedia article around either, but that is a discussion for another day...--Jayron32|talk|contribs 18:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above but also copyvio of http://upaya.org/htmls/BeingDyingHome.html Kernel Saunters 20:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No independent third-party sources. Can't judge the notability without them. EdJohnston 03:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.