- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. —Larry V (talk | contribs) 04:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No reference to support notability claim. Fails WP:BIO. Edcolins 13:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, no assertion of notability. Moreschi 13:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't appear to be the least bit notable. A college student who has "theories" about robots, which, as far as I can tell, aren't anything new, nor substantial enough to warrant an article about him yet. If he ever does invent the first thinking robot, well...WE'RE DOOMED! (I don't think we have anything to worry about, though) Wavy G 00:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, nn bio fluff piece. SkierRMH,07:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete CSD A7. B.Wind 04:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. There are no references to this guy's work at all, and as other people say, above, even what he claims he has worked on is totally unremarkable. Ipthief 07:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.