- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ben Seton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence of significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions for WP:ENT. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. sources provided are (at time of nomination) either unreliable and/or not independent (3,4,5,8), about someone or something else (1,2 (1 may mention him in a very trivial manor)), a film listing (6), not mentioning Ben Seton (2,3,7) and trivial (1?,4,5,6,8) duffbeerforme (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom, insignificant coverage.--PinkBull 16:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While his career is can be WP:Verified, and is perhaps sneaking up on WP:ENT, the total lack of coverage seems indicative of lack of notability. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.