Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Shinewald
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Canadian lawyer YUL89YYZ 10:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom; he may be N in five years, but NN now. Billbrock 10:24, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but asserts too much notability for speedy. Jamie (talk/contribs) 10:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom.209.202.119.248 14:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Detele, per nomination. NN. --Thunk 23:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral. Clerking for the Chief Justice of a national Supreme Court is, I think, enough for notability. But only if we can establish that it was for a serious length of time, and that he had a significant role. -Joshuapaquin (strawpoll) 19:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.