Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bennett Hardness Scale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be non-notable, and possibly original research. -- Filliam H Muffman 05:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete looks like WP:OR and has no sources or other support for notability. Gwernol 06:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable and original research --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 07:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn & WP:NOR. --Khoikhoi 09:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Uncited, unreferenced Original research.  (aeropagitica)  09:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as something dreamed up in school one day. Gene Nygaard 14:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as of now not notable. Newyorktimescrossword 20:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:OR and returns only 14 google hits. JoshuaZ 20:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFT as well. Note that the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics is a high school, not a research institution. Zetawoof^(ζ) 21:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, neat term paper. WP:NFT per Mr. Woof. Kuru ^talk 22:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. ProhibitOnions 23:00, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. OR, WP:NFT --Icarus 08:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.